With the release of MT 3.0 today, new license agreements
Commercial) were also unveiled
at the same time. The objectionable terms in MT's prior license agreements relating to
support services and compensation appear to have been eliminated.
But in the new FAQ is
this apparent holdover:
Q: I want to charge for installations. Is this allowed?
A: You may charge for installation of Movable Type for any user who has purchased
a license for Movable Type Personal Edition or any Commercial Use license. Charging
for installation of the free, unsupported version of Movable Type is not permitted.
Sorry, but Six Apart cannot prohibit that. I'm puzzled as to why that would even be
included. Surely it wouldn't be something as petty as "Well, Six Apart didn't make
any money from that user, so no one else can either", would it? Fortunately, the FAQ is
not legally binding or enforceable.
Here's some new license terms that caught my eye -
From the Personal License:
A Little Credit. You must maintain, on every page generated by the Software,
an operable link to http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/ , with the link text
"Powered by Movable Type", as specified by Six Apart, unless otherwise stated
in the terms included with your copy of the Software.
I'm curious how exactly a user is supposed to do this with a stylesheet page. The
old Personal License only required such a link (or logo) to be displayed on the main page.
This next one is in both license agreements:
Age Restrictions. The Software is not intended for use by persons under the age
of 13 and may not be used anyone under such age.
Okay, what's up with that? Is the new MT3 hazardous to small children?
From the Commercial License:
Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for the period
corresponding to the fee you pay and set forth in your copy of the Software,
unless terminated earlier as provided herein.
This sounds to me like a 'software as a service' clause, where licenses are sold
for a specific period of time (such as 1 year, 2 years, etc.). I wonder if commercial
users will wake up one day to find their MT licenses now have expiration dates, and
if they want to keep using MT, they have to keep paying the license fees over and over.
This last one is also from the Commercial License:
Educational institutions are not qualified to use this Standard Commercial Use
License and must enter into an Educational License with Six Apart.
I don't know if this is good or bad for educational institutions. I did not see an
'Educational License' on Six Apart's web site, and there is no pricing information
published to indicate whether an educational institution would pay more or less for
an Educational License than it would for a Commercial one. My guess: It pays more under
an Educational License; why else prohibit them from purchasing a Commercial License?
For the most part, these agreements looks okay (as far as software license agreements go).
This doesn't really matter now though, as the real fuss is over MT3's new pricing.